A mostly empirical approach to assessing the coronavirus impact on markets

22 January 2020

Jim McCormickGlobal Head of Desk Strategy

View bio

Other insights

View more insights

5 minute read

Jim McCormick, Global Head of Desk Strategy, presents an empirical framework to help provide some loose guidance in assessing the potential impact that the new coronavirus could have on global financial markets.

It may get worse before it gets better

I always hesitate to have too much to say when it comes to issues like today’s coronavirus escalation. There are too many unknowns, so best not to try and be too clever about the potential financial market impact. That said, if you accept the fact there will be an impact on global growth and that under most circumstances it will be big but likely temporary, there are some basic assumptions about how the virus could impact growth-linked assets. We use our Growth Asset Framework to help.

Putting the spotlight on growth-linked assets

As a refresher, our Growth Asset Framework looks at market valuations for a basket of 20 growth-linked assets against the 6-month rolling trend global manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) data. With this in mind, we can estimate the impact on growth-linked assets by attempting to estimate the impact on the global manufacturing PMI from the coronavirus.

Step 1: Assess the impact of the 2003 SARs episode

To do this, we can use the 2003 SARs episode, given it is probably the closest comparison to what is happening today. Although, markets are in a very different place today, compared to 2003 – so it’s sensible to bear this in mind. Manufacturing PMI data were a bit more sparse back then, but we have data for Hong Kong as well as an aggregate for developed economy manufacturing. Hong Kong was one of the hardest hit countries during the SARS epidemic, so this is probably a reasonable proxy for what we might expect for the broader Asia region, China especially. As Chart 1 below shows, the Hong Kong PMI fell from above 50 in February 2003 to 38 in April – then returned to 50 by June. The developed market manufacturing PMI fell by 2.5 points during the same period and also recovered fully not long after.

Chart 1: Impact of 2003 SARS episode on Hong Kong 

Source: NatWest Markets

Step 2: Plot the PMI trend for the coming months

Next, we can use our Global Manufacturing PMI estimate to try and build a profile of the trend in the coming months. The assumptions we have made are meant to be simple – China’s manufacturing PMI falls by a similar amount to Hong Kong’s drop in 2003 (from just above 50 to 40). Other Asian countries fall by 5 PMI points and the rest match the developed markets trend in 2003 (down 2.5 points). Based on these simple assumptions, the global manufacturing PMI could fall from just above 50 today, to a level near 46 in the coming 2-3 months.

Assuming as with the SARS episode the impact on global manufacturing is temporary, we’d expect the PMI to resume its modest upward trend above 50 by late spring. I’d emphasise again that these assumptions are purposefully simplistic – they are only meant to illustrate would the global manufacturing PMI would look like if the current coronavirus closely followed the 2003 SARS script. The reason today's decline looks so significant is China is nine times bigger as an economy then it was in 2003.    

Chart 2: Global Manufacturing PMI estimate using the 2003 SARs impact on Hong Kong and DM PMIs

Source: NatWest Markets, Markit, Haver

Step 3: Implications for growth-linked assets 

Finally, we can look to see what our global manufacturing PMI estimate implies for the trend in growth-linked assets in the coming few months. Using this model process, the results don’t make for great viewing, at least in the near term. At first look, the Growth Asset Basket could fall toward or even below levels last seen in late 2018, during the major risk-off episode at the time – if our estimates are kept in line with the PMI estimates outlined above.

That said, I’d be hesitant to take this at face value, especially given the failure of our Growth Asset Basket to respond to the weak manufacturing cycle last year. I’d also strongly emphasize that, like in 2003, our framework assumes the economic and market impact this time is temporary. Still, there are two reasons to be at least a little concerned about the downside risk from today’ s coronavirus episode.

Chart 3: NWM Growth Asset Basket and the 6-month rolling trend in the global manufacturing PMI (including est for next 3 months)

Source: NatWest Markets, Bloomberg, Markit, Haver

 

2 reasons to be a little concerned about the downside risk from coronavirus

First, the reason markets outperformed the business cycle last year was the aggressive response by central banks. But as we have discussed many times, central banks are running low on ammunition, so the response this time around may not be as aggressive. Moreover, last year’s manufacturing cycle weakness was centred in developed markets – today’s weakness will be mostly in Asia, China especially. The US Federal Reserve (the Fed) certainly has room to cut further and we think they ultimately will this year – but we’d probably need to see large spill over effects into the US economy and the S&P500 for the Fed to be back in play quickly.

A second reason for caution is markets were ill-prepared for an escalation is the coronavirus epidemic. Market implied volatility hit an all-time low two weeks ago, according to the core volatility indices we track - this is not a market that has been placing much value on the risk of another lurch lower in the manufacturing cycle and risk assets.

It’s only loose guidance

As I said at the start, issues like today’s coronavirus episode are difficult to assess. What I have tried to do here is present an empirical framework that can at least help provide some loose guidance. The best I can say is that it may get worse before it gets better. Although, keep in mind that markets today are very different from markets in 2003, which we have used to anchor our empirical model. But it’s the closest thing we’ve got today to help give us any sort of firm grounding to assess market implications. So I guess we just need to wait and see.

And remember – the market decline during the SARs episode was temporary and it all cleared up after a couple of months. Stay tuned for more updates as we monitor the situation.

Global outlook


This article has been prepared for information purposes only, does not constitute an analysis of all potentially material issues and is subject to change at any time without prior notice. NatWest Markets does not undertake to update you of such changes.  It is indicative only and is not binding. Other than as indicated, this article has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information believed to be reliable but no representation, warranty, undertaking or assurance of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information contained in this article, nor does NatWest Markets accept any obligation to any recipient to update or correct any information contained herein. Views expressed herein are not intended to be and should not be viewed as advice or as a personal recommendation. The views expressed herein may not be objective or independent of the interests of the authors or other NatWest Markets trading desks, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to in this article. NatWest Markets will not act and has not acted as your legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment adviser; nor does NatWest Markets owe any fiduciary duties to you in connection with this, and/or any related transaction and no reliance may be placed on NatWest Markets for investment advice or recommendations of any sort. You should make your own independent evaluation of the relevance and adequacy of the information contained in this article and any issues that are of concern to you.

This article does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment, nor does it constitute an offer to provide any products or services that are capable of acceptance to form a contract. NatWest Markets and each of its respective affiliates accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this material or reliance on the information contained herein. However this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not be lawfully disclaimed.

NatWest Markets Plc. Incorporated and registered in Scotland No. 90312 with limited liability. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. NatWest Markets N.V. is incorporated with limited liability in the Netherlands, authorised and regulated by De Nederlandsche Bank and the Autoriteit Financiële Markten. It has its seat at Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and is registered in the Commercial Register under number 33002587. Registered Office: Claude Debussylaan 94, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Branch Reg No. in England BR001029. NatWest Markets Plc is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets N.V. and NatWest Markets N.V. is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets Plc.

Copyright © NatWest Markets Plc. All rights reserved.